Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Utah Prohibit Public Sector Union Collective Bargaining Referendum (2026)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Utah Prohibit Public Sector Union Collective Bargaining Referendum

Flag of Utah.png

Election date

November 3, 2026

Topic
Collective bargaining
Status

On the ballot

Type
Veto referendum
Origin

Citizens



The Utah Prohibit Public Sector Union Collective Bargaining Referendum is on the ballot in Utah as a veto referendum on November 3, 2026.

A "yes" vote would uphold House Bill 267, which would prohibit public employers from entering into collective bargaining agreements with labor unions.

A "no" vote would repeal House Bill 267, which would prohibit public employers from entering into collective bargaining agreements with labor unions. 


Overview

What would the referendum do?

See also: Measure design

If the majority of voters vote "yes" on the referendum, HB 267 would be upheld and go into effect after the election. If the majority of voters vote "no" on the referendum, HB 267 would be repealed.

If approved by voters, HB 267 would prohibit public employers from participating in collective bargaining with a labor organization or union acting as an agent of their public employees.[1] In addition, HB 267 would:

  • prohibit employers from granting their employees supplemental paid time off to participate in union activity;
  • repeal the Utah Fire Fighters' Negotiation Act;
  • make changes to the composition of the Utah State Retirement Board and the Membership Council of the Utah Retirement Systems Administration;
  • bar future public employees from entering the Utah Retirement System, which would result in the discontinuation of the system over time, among other changes.

HB 267 would not prohibit public sector employees from joining labor unions or other labor organizations.

What is collective bargaining?

Collective bargaining is the process by which employees negotiate through unions or other chosen representatives with their employer.[2] The contracts decided through collective bargaining, called collective bargaining agreements (CBAs), set the contractual terms and conditions of their employment. Topics considered in such agreements can include hours, salary, benefits, leave policy, and other working conditions. Often, employees pay a fee to be represented and included in the CBA; this fee, called union dues, are what employees pay to be a member of the union.[3]

HB 267 would prohibit public employers from entering into a collective bargaining agreement with a union or other representative of public employees.[1] It would prohibit the renewal or extension of an existing collective bargaining agreement with a labor organization. Bargaining agreements with an expiration date after May 7, 2025, would continue to be valid until the agreement expires.

What do supporters and opponents of the collective bargaining ban say?

See also: Support and Opposition

Supporters of HB 267 say that the law would protect taxpayer money from being subject to collective bargaining. State Rep. Jordan Reuscher (R-44) said, "Really what we’re trying to do is ensure that all public employees have a voice at the table when they’re negotiating contracts and that we’re protecting taxpayer resources. That labor unions aren’t getting access to taxpayer resources."[4] In addition, Utah Parents United said HB 267 "ends collective bargaining, requires transparency in political activity, and stops our tax dollars from funding union business during school hours."[5]

Opponents of HB 267 say the law would be detrimental to public sector working conditions. Protect Utah Workers, the campaign supporting the referendum, said in a statement on their website, "Without collective bargaining, public workers lose their most effective tool for advocating workplace improvements. Safe working conditions and fair wages aren't just good for public workers. They lead to better services and safer communities for all Utahns."[6] President of the Utah Education Association, Renée Pinkney, said, "This referendum is about restoring fairness, dignity and the ability for workers to have a say in their wages, working conditions and futures."[7]

Measure design

Click on the following sections for summaries of the different provisions of HB 267.[1]


Expand All
Prohibition on collective bargaining
Requirement to withdraw from the Utah Retirement System
Repeal of the Utah Fire Fighters' Negotiations Act
Utah State Retirement Board
Membership Council of the Utah Retirement Systems Administration
Miscellaneous amendments to labor policy


Text of measure

Full text

The full text of HB 267, which the referendum would repeal, is below:[1]

Support for HB 267

Supporters

Officials

Organizations

  • American for Prosperity - Utah
  • Utah Parents United


Arguments

  • State Sen. Kirk Cullimore (R-19): "More than 99% of all the unions that currently exist today do not do collective bargaining. All the services that they provide their members, the services they provide employees, all the education and training that they do, will still be available."
  • Utah Parents United: "Teacher unions are not focused on student success, fair teacher pay, or acknowledging that Utah now ranks second in the nation for starting salaries. Every one of these achievements happened in spite of their opposition. Their push to overturn HB267 isn’t about helping teachers or students—it’s about protecting their power over Utah’s education system."
  • State Rep. Jordan Reuscher (R-44): "Really what we’re trying to do is ensure that all public employees have a voice at the table when they’re negotiating contracts and that we’re protecting taxpayer resources. That labor unions aren’t getting access to taxpayer resources."


Opposition to HB 267

PUW+Logo+FINAL.png

Protect Utah Workers is leading the campaign in support of the "no" vote to repeal HB 267.[8]

Opponents

Unions

  • American Federation of Government Employees
  • American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
  • American Federation of Teachers - Utah
  • Communications Workers of America Local 7765
  • International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers L354
  • International Union of Painters and Allied Trades
  • National Education Association
  • Salt Lake Valley Law Enforcement Association
  • Sheet Metal Workers L312
  • Teamsters Local 222
  • UFCW 99
  • United Mountain Workers
  • Utah Education Association
  • Utah Public Employees Association
  • Utah School Employees Association


Arguments

  • American Federation of Teachers Utah President Brad Asay: "The legislators that voted for this and the sponsors of this bill will pick party and political philosophy over the will of the people. They don’t listen to their people and they don’t listen to their constituents."
  • Protect Utah Workers: "Without collective bargaining, public workers lose their most effective tool for advocating workplace improvements. Safe working conditions and fair wages aren't just good for public workers. They lead to better services and safer communities for all Utahns."
  • Utah Education Association President Renée Pinkney: "This referendum is about restoring fairness, dignity and the ability for workers to have a say in their wages, working conditions and futures."


Polls

See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls and 2026 ballot measure polls
Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
Utah Prohibit Public Sector Union Collective Bargaining Referendum (2026)
Poll
Dates
Sample size
Margin of error
Support
Oppose
Undecided
Harris X 5/16/25-5/21/25 805 RV ± 3.5% 36% 33% 34%
Question: "The referendum to repeal the law that bans public employee unions in Utah from collective bargaining recently qualified for the 2026 ballot. If the election were held today, would you vote in favor or against the referendum?"

Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.


Campaign finance

See also: Ballot measure campaign finance, 2026
The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through April 11, 2025. The deadline for the next scheduled reports is September 30, 2025.


Utahns for Worker Freedom registered to support the "yes" vote, which would retain HB 267.[9] As of the last report date, they reported no contributions or expenditures. Protect Utah Workers registered to support the "no" vote, which would repeal HB 267.[9]

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $2,218,714.06 $1,238,926.95 $3,457,641.01 $1,295,396.15 $2,534,323.10
Total $2,218,714.06 $1,238,926.95 $3,457,641.01 $1,295,396.15 $2,534,323.10


Opposition

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in opposition to the measure.[9]

Committees in opposition to Prohibit Public Sector Union Collective Bargaining Referendum
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Protect Utah Workers $2,218,714.06 $1,238,926.95 $3,457,641.01 $1,295,396.15 $2,534,323.10
Total $2,218,714.06 $1,238,926.95 $3,457,641.01 $1,295,396.15 $2,534,323.10

Donors

The following were the top donors who contributed to the opposition committee.[9]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
National Education Association $1,587,976.25 $788,448.22 $2,376,424.47
Utah Education Association $182,155.00 $143,630.00 $325,785.00
AFSCME $250,000.00 $0.00 $250,000.00
UFCW Local 99 $100,000.00 $6,584.01 $106,584.01
Utah School Employees' Association $3,315.00 $18,177.87 $21,492.87

Methodology

To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.

Background

House Bill 267 (2025)

On January 21, 2025, State Rep. Jordan Teuscher (R-44) introduced HB 267 to the Utah House of Representatives.[10] On January 23, 2025, the House Business, Labor, and Commerce Committee advanced the bill to the full house with a favorable recommendation. On January 27, 2025, the house passed the bill with a 42-32 vote, with one representative absent. Forty-two Republicans voted yes, and 18 Republicans and 14 Democrats voted no. One Republican was absent. On January 29, 2025, the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee advanced the bill to the full senate with a favorable recommendation. On February 6, 2025, the senate passed the bill with a 16-13 vote. Sixteen Republicans voted yes, and seven Republicans and six Democrats voted no.

House Bill 267 Vote Senate House
Yes No NV Yes No NV
Total 16 13 0 42 32 1
Democratic (D) 0 6 0 0 14 0
Republican (R) 16 7 0 42 18 1

Utah collective bargaining law

See also: Public-sector union policy in the United States, 2018-2023

In 1969, the Utah state legislature passed its right-to-work law. The law established that employers and unions can not require union membership, non-membership, or payment of union dues as a condition of employment.[11] No distinction in the law differentiates between the rights of public sector and private sector employees to form and join unions or collectively bargain.

In 1975, the Utah state legislature passed the Utah Firefighters' Negotiations Act.[12] It explicitly granted firefighters the right to bargain collectively and stated that any employer, including cities and other governing bodies, has the duty to participate in collective bargaining with firefighters' union groups. This point in particular differs from the rights afforded to other public sector employees. Utah employers only have the duty to bargain with firefighters, and not with other public safety or public sector employees.

The most recent legislation, other than HB 267, involving public sector unions was passed in 2024. That year, State Rep. Jordan Teuscher and State Sen. Kirk Cullimore sponsored House Bill 285 which would have changed state statute concerning public unions. It would have made union membership voluntary for employees, required employees to provide written annual authorization for union dues to be deducted from their paycheck, and required that public employers stay neutral regarding union organization efforts. The bill was not approved by either the house or the senate.[13]

Veto referendum ballot measures in Utah

See also: List of veto referendum ballot measures

A veto referendum is a type of citizen-initiated ballot measure that asks voters whether to uphold or repeal a law passed by the state legislature. The veto referendum ballot measure is also known as a popular referendum, people's veto, or citizen's veto. Utah is one of 23 states that have a process for veto referendums.

Five veto referendums have appeared on the ballot in Utah: one in 1942, two in 1954, one in 1974, and most recently in 2007. In all cases, the referendum efforts resulted in the targeted law being repealed.

In Utah, bills passed by the state legislature can be put before voters through a veto referendum petition.

  • Signature requirement: 8 percent of registered voters on January 1 after the previous general election
  • Result of a yes vote: targeted law upheld
  • Result of a no vote: targeted law repealed
  • Does not allow for veto referendums on emergency legislation
  • Successful veto referendum petitions suspend the targeted law until the election
Year State Subject Measure Outcome
for target law
2007 Utah Education Referendum 1: School Vouchers Repealed
1974 Utah Property Referendum 1: Land Use Act Repealed
1954 Utah Education Referendum A: Abolishment of Carbon College Repealed
1954 Utah Education Referendum B: Dixie, Snow and Weber Colleges as Private Organizations Repealed
1942 Utah Business regulations and Business taxes Chain Store License Tax Referendum Repealed

Public sector collective bargaining restrictions in other states

A total of nine states have some form of restrictions on collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) between an employer and a public sector labor unions. CBAs are contracts that determine employment terms and conditions. Two states, North Carolina and South Carolina, have banned collective bargaining agreements for all public sector employees.

Other collective bargaining ballot measures in 2026

See also: Collective bargaining ballot measures

Proposal 3 will be on the ballot for Vermont voters in 2026. Proposal 3 would amend the Vermont Constitution's Declaration of Rights to provide that employees have a state constitutional right to organize and join a labor organization for collective bargaining with their employer. This constitutional right to collective bargaining would include "negotiating wages, hours, and working conditions and to protect their economic welfare and safety in the workplace."[14] Proposal 3 would prohibit laws that interfere with, negate, or diminish this constitutional right, including those that ban agreements requiring union membership as a condition of employment (right-to-work laws). The amendment makes no distinction between the rights of public and private employees.


Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing the initiative process in Utah

The state process

A veto referendum is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that asks voters whether to uphold or repeal an enacted law. This type of ballot measure is also called statute referendum, popular referendum, people's veto, or citizen's veto. There are 23 states that allow citizens to initiate veto referendums.

For veto referendums in Utah, proponents must gather signatures equal to 8 percent of the total number of active voters. For referendum petitions, signatures must be collected from each of at least 15 of the 29 counties in Utah equal to 8 percent of active voters.

Signatures for veto referendums must be submitted on a 14-day rolling basis and must all be submitted within 40 days of the adjournment of the legislative session at which the targeted bill was passed.

The requirements to get a veto referendum certified for the 2026 ballot:

  • Signatures: 140,748 valid signatures
  • Deadline: Within 40 days of the adjournment of the legislative session at which the targeted bill was passed

Details about this initiative

The following is the timeline of the initiative:

  • February 14, 2025: Utah Governor Spencer Cox (R) signed HB 267 into law. The bill was set to take effect on July 1, 2025.[15]
  • March 10, 2025: The lieutenant governor's office approved the veto referendum sponsored Protect Utah Workers, allowing the group to begin signature collection on March 15, with signatures due on April 16, 2025.[16]
  • March 28, 2025: The Utah Public Employees Association reported collecting more than 130,000 signatures.[17]
  • April 15, 2025: Signature gathering ended and the secretary of state began verifying signature sheets.
  • April 16, 2025: Protect Utah Workers announced they had submitted more than 320,000 signatures to the secretary of state. [18]
  • April 28, 2025: As of this date, the Utah Secretary of State had verified 146,480 signatures.[19] Utah Political Watch News announced that the 8% requirement has been achieved in 15 out of 29 senate districts in the state.[20]
  • May 6, 2025: Lieutenant Governor Deidre Henderson (R) issued a temporary stay on the effective date of HB 267, pending the review of submitted signatures for the referendum. [21]
  • May 8, 2025: The Lieutenant Governor's Office announced that signature verification was complete. In total, 251,274 signatures had been verified and 73,136 signatures had been rejected.[22]
  • June 21, 2025: The Lieutenant Governor's Office issued a press release announcing the veto referendum would be placed on the ballot.[23]
  • June 23, 2025: Gov. Cox issued a press release stating that the referendum would be decided during the November 3, 2026 election.[24]

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Utah

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Utah.

How to vote in Utah


See also

2026 ballot measures

View other measures certified for the 2026 ballot across the U.S. and in Utah.

Utah ballot measures
Legislative process

Understand how measures are placed on the ballot and the rules that apply.

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Utah State Legislature, "House Bill 267," accessed April 28, 2025 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "text" defined multiple times with different content
  2. AFL-CIO, "Collective Bargaining," accessed June 27, 2025
  3. Investopedia, "Collective Bargaining," accessed June 27, 2025
  4. Fox13Now, "Unions organize against bill cracking down on public employee collective bargaining," accessed Jun 27, 2025
  5. Utah Parents United, "Decline to Sign," accessed June 27, 2025
  6. Protect Utah Workers, "The Truth About HB 267: Public Sector Labor Union Amendments," accessed June 27, 2025
  7. KPCW, "Public labor unions launch campaign to repeal law banning collective bargaining," accessed June 27, 2025
  8. Protect Utah Workers, "Homepage," accessed April 24, 2025
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Utah Lieutenant Governor's Office-Public Search, "State of Utah Financial Disclosures," accessed April 24, 2025
  10. Utah State Legislature, "HB 267 Status," accessed May 2, 2025
  11. Utah State Legislature, "Utah Right to Work Law," accessed April 28. 2025
  12. Utah State Code, "Utah Fire Fighters' Negotiations Act," accessed June 26, 2025
  13. Utah State Legislature, "House Bill 285," accessed April 28, 2025
  14. Vermont State Legislature, "Proposal 3," accessed May 1, 2025
  15. Utah State Legislature "HB 267," accessed March 11, 2025
  16. Utah News Dispatch, "Coalition gets green light to start gathering signatures in effort to overturn union bill," accessed March 11, 2025
  17. Fox 13 Now, "130,000 signatures so far on referendum to overturn Utah's ban on public employee collective bargaining," accessed March 28, 2025
  18. Salt Lake Tribune, "‘You made this possible’: Labor organizers submit twice the signatures needed to put bargaining ban to voters," accessed April 17, 2025
  19. Utah.gov, "Statewide Referendum – 2025 H.B. 267 Public Sector Labor Union Amendments Referendum – List of Signers," accessed April 28, 2025
  20. Utah Political Watch, "Referendum to overturn Utah's anti-union HB267 hits signature goal," accessed April 28, 2025
  21. Lt. Gov. Deidre M. Henderson on X, "H.B. 267 update," accessed May 7, 2025
  22. Vote Utah on X, "SHB 267 referendum update. Signature verification is complete," accessed May 9, 2025
  23. Facebook, "Utah Education Association on Facebook," accessed June 23, 2025
  24. Gephardt Daily, "Labor Union referendum to go before Utah voters on 2026 general election ballot," accessed June 23, 2025
  25. Utah State Legislature, “Utah Code 20A-1-302. Opening and closing of polls on election day.” accessed May 13, 2025
  26. 26.0 26.1 Utah State Legislature, “Utah Code 20A-2-101. Eligibility for registration.” accessed May 13, 2025
  27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 Utah Lieutenant Governor, “Welcome to the Utah Voter Registration Website,” accessed May 13, 2025
  28. 28.0 28.1 Utah State Legislature, “20A-2-207. Registration by provisional ballot.” accessed May 13, 2025
  29. NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed May 13, 2025
  30. Utah State Legislature, “Utah Code 20A-2-401. Fraudulent registration -- Penalty.” accessed May 13, 2025
  31. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  32. 32.0 32.1 Utah State Legislature, "Utah Code 20A-1-102. Definitions." accessed May 13, 2025
  33. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.